Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) has a very long and somewhat complicated history dating all the way back to 1921. The first income tax code was adopted by the United States Congress in 1918 as part of The Revenue Act of 1918, and did not provide for any type of tax-deferred like-kind exchange structure.
The first tax-deferred like-kind exchange was authorized as part of The Revenue Act of 1921, when the United States Congress created Section 202(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, allowing Investors to exchange securities and non-like-kind property unless the property acquired had a “readily realizable market value.”
These non-like-kind property provisions were quickly eliminated with the adoption of The Revenue Act of 1924. The Section number applicable to tax-deferred like-kind exchanges was changed to Section 112(b)(1) with the passage of The Revenue Act of 1928. In 1935, the Board of Tax Appeals approved the first modern tax-deferred like-kind exchange using a Qualified Intermediary (Accommodator) and the “cash in lieu of” clause was upheld so that it would not invalidate the tax-deferred like-kind exchange transaction.
Creation of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code
The 1954 Amendment to the Federal Tax Code changed the Section 112(b)(1) number to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code and adopted the present day definition and description of a tax-deferred like-kind exchange, laying the groundwork for the current day structure of the tax-deferred like-kind exchange transaction.
Starker Family Case Sets Precedent
The tax court cases and corresponding decisions, including an appellate decision from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals resulting from the now famous Starker family tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions, changed the tax-deferred like-kind exchange industry forever. The Starker family litigation stemmed from two delayed tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions where T.J. Starker and his son Bruce Starker sold timberland to Crown Zellerback, Inc. in exchange for a contractual promise to acquire and transfer title to properties identified by T.J. Starker and Bruce Starker within five (5) years. The Internal Revenue Service disallowed this arrangement, contending, among other things, that a delayed exchange did not qualify for non-recognition treatment (i.e. deferral of income tax liabilities).
These tax court decisions were significant in numerous ways and set the precedent for our present day non-simultaneous, delayed tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions.
The Starker family cases demonstrated to the investment community that non-simultaneous, delayed tax-deferred like-kind exchanges will qualify for non-recognition treatment, which provided Investors (Sellers) with significantly more flexibility in the structuring of tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions.
45-Day/180-Day Rules Introduced
The Starker family tax-deferred like-kind exchange tax court decisions established the need for regulations regarding delayed tax-deferred like-kind exchanges and prompted the United States Congress to eventually adopt the 45 calendar day Identification Deadline and the 180 calendar day Exchange Period as part of The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, which also “codified” or adopted the delayed tax-deferred like-kind exchange provisions that we have today. The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 also amended Section 1031(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code to specifically disallow exchanges of partnership interests (See Section on Partnership Issues).
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 is responsible for the tremendous explosion in the number of tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions administered today. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminated preferential capital gain treatment so that all capital gains were taxed as ordinary income, enacted “passive loss” and “at risk” rules, and eliminated accelerated depreciation methods in favor of straight line depreciation consisting of 39 years for commercial property and 27.5 years for residential property. These changes significantly restricted the tax benefits of owning real estate and catapulted the tax-deferred like-kind exchange into the lime light as being one of the few income tax benefits left for real property Investors.
Domestic vs. Non-Domestic and Related Party Issues Addressed
The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1989 resulted in a few changes to the tax-deferred like-kind exchange arena, including the disqualification of tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions between domestic (United States) and non-domestic (foreign) property and placed restrictions on related party tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions in the form of a two year holding period requirement.
Tax-Deferred Exchange Regulations Issued by IRS
The long awaited proposed tax-deferred like-kind exchange rules and regulations were issued by the Department of the Treasury effective July 2, 1990. The proposed rules and regulations specifically clarified the 45 calendar day identification period and the 180 calendar day exchange period rules, provided guidance on how to deal with actual and constructive receipt issues in the form of safe harbor provisions, reaffirmed that partnership interests do not qualify as like-kind property in a tax-deferred like-kind exchange transaction, and further clarified the related party rules.
The proposed tax-deferred like-kind exchange rules and regulations were issued as final rules and regulations effective June 10, 1991 with only a few minor adjustments, including the further clarification and definition of what constitutes a “simultaneous exchange” and an “improvement exchange,” and which parties were disqualified from serving as a Qualified Intermediary (Accommodator).
The Tax Relief Act of 1997 attempted to significantly change Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, but failed. There have been a number of attempts to alter portions of the 1031 Exchange code and regulations ever since, but none have been successful to date.
Parking Arrangement Guidelines Issued for Reverse 1031 Exchange Structures
The issuance of Revenue Procedure 2000-37 gave Investors and Qualified Intermediaries guidelines on how to structure reverse tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions where the Investor’s like-kind replacement property can be acquired before he disposes of his relinquished property. This reduced the risk associated with the 45 calendar day identification period.
Tenant-In-Common (TIC) Investment Property Guidelines Introduced by IRS
The introduction of Revenue Procedure 2002-22 has arguably had the most significant impact on the 1031 Exchange industry since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. It provided investors with an additional replacement property option that had not existed before — fractional or co-ownership of real estate (CORE) — and is partially responsible for the explosive growth in the volume of 1031 Exchange transactions between 2002 and 2007.
However, The Great Recession of 2005 to 2009, along with growing issues among many TIC owners to make required property decisions forced some difficult lessons on lenders. Lenders are now very hesitant to lend under any TIC investment property structure, so investors must now look to the Delaware Statutory Trust in order to get lenders on board.
Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) Guidelines Introduced by the IRS
Revenue Ruling 2004-86 was issued by the Treasury Department paving the way for a whole new way for investors to invest in fractional or co-ownership interests in real property. Revenue Ruling 2004-86 now permitted Delaware Statutory Trusts or DSTs to qualify as real estate and therefore as a replacement property solution for 1031 Exchange transactions. Investors could acquire a fractional or percentage interest in the Delaware Statutory Trust as a beneficiary in the DST. In the end, the net effect of the DST is very similar to the TIC investment property but offers a number of improvements that appeals to both lenders and many investors.
1031 Exchanges Can Be Combined with 121 Exclusion
Revenue Procedure 2005-14 was issued and made effective on January 27, 2005 and made it possible for the first time for homeowners to use the tax-deferral mechanism of Section 1031 on their primary residence, if done in conjunction with the specific strategy delineated under the Revenue Procedure.
So long as the property in question satisfies the requirements for both Code Sections 1031 and 121, then the Section 121 Exclusion operates to exclude from taxable income either 250,000 or 500,000 in capital gain from the sale, exchange or disposition of the property and any additional gain may be deferred by reinvesting in like-kind replacement property through a tax-deferred like-kind exchange.
The above discussion is reprinted in part with permission of Exeter 1031 Exchange Services, LLC
BIO : Paul Getty
Paul Getty is a licensed real estate broker in the state of California and Texas and has been directly involved in commercial transactions totaling over $2 billion on assets throughout the United States. His experience spans all major asset classes including retail, office, multifamily, and student and senior housing.Paul Getty’s transaction experience includes buy and sell side representation, sourcing and structuring of debt and equity, work-outs, and asset and property management. He has worked closely with nationally prominent real estate brokerage and investment organizations including Marcus Millichap, CB Richard Ellis, JP Morgan, and Morgan Stanley among others on the firm’s numerous transactions.Paul Getty also maintains a broad network of active buyers and sellers of commercial real estate including lenders, institutions, family office managers, and high net worth individuals.
Prior to founding First Guardian Group/FGG1031,Paul Getty was a founder and CEO of Venture Navigation, a boutique investment banking firm specializing in structuring equity investments made by institutions and high net worth individuals. He possesses over 25 years of comprehensive worldwide business management experience in environments ranging from early phase start-ups to multi-billion dollar corporations. His track record includes participation in IPOs and successful M&A activity that has resulted in investor returns of over $700M.
Paul Getty holds an MBA in Finance from the University of Michigan, graduating with honors, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Chemistry from Wayne State University. He is a member of Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM), a Certified Property Manager Candidate (CPM), and a member of the US Green Building Council.Paul Getty holds Series 22, 62, and 63 securities licenses and is a registered representative with LightPath Capital Inc, member FINRA /SIPC .
Paul Getty is a noted speaker, author, and actively lectures on investments and sales and management related topics. He is author of The 12 Magic Slides ,Regulation A+: How the JOBS Act Creates Opportunities for Entrepreneurs and Investors , and Tax Deferral Strategies Utilizing the Delaware Statutory Trust (DST), available on Amazon and other retail outlets.
This material is not intended as tax or legal advice so please do speak with your attorney and CPA prior to considering an investment. This material contains information that has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, FGG1031, First Guardian Group, LightPath Capital, Inc., and their representatives do not guarantee the accuracy and validity of the information herein. Investors should perform their own investigations before considering any investment. There are material risks associated with investing in real estate, Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) and 1031 Exchange properties. These include, but are not limited to, tenant vacancies, declining market values, potential loss of entire investment principal.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results: potential cash flow, potential returns, and potential appreciation are not guaranteed in any way and adverse tax consequences can take effect. The income stream and depreciation schedule for any investment property may affect the property owner’s income bracket and/or tax status. An unfavorable tax ruling may cancel deferral of capital gains and result in immediate tax liabilities. All financed real estate investments have a potential for foreclosure. Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) investments are commonly offered through private placement offerings and are illiquid securities. There is no secondary market for these investments. Like any investment in real estate, if a property unexpectedly loses tenants or sustains substantial damage, there is potential for suspension of cash flow distributions. Costs associated with the transaction may impact investors’ returns and may outweigh the tax benefits.
IRC Section 1031, IRC Section 1033, and IRC Section 721 are complex tax codes; therefore, you should consult your tax and legal professional for details regarding your situation. Securities offered through registered representatives of LightPath Capital, Inc. Member FINRA / SIPC. FGG1031, First Guardian Group, and LightPath Capital, Inc. are separate entities.
DST 1031 properties are only available to accredited investors (generally described as having a net worth of over one million dollars exclusive of primary residence) and accredited entities only (generally described as an entity owned entirely by accredited individuals and/or an entity with gross assets of greater than five million dollars). If you are unsure if you are an accredited investor and/or an accredited entity, please verify with your CPA and Attorney prior to considering an investment. You may be required to verify your status as an accredited investor. LightPath Capital, Inc